The theatrical conceit, which I’d not seen before, and the smart script, which has been well-researched and has cogent points to make in each of the three acts (decades).
What I didn't like
Casting could be sharper in a couple of cases.
My overall impression
Here’s the sort of theatrical invention that always makes a trip to the Fringe a delightful adventure: Three pairs of men, a generation apart, play the same two 20th-century celebs a decade apart—-Ernest Hemingway and Orson Welles in 1937, 1947 and 1960! What a great idea! Not all the casting is “spot-on”, but the theatrical conceit carries the show. The script is witty, too, which helps a lot!